The Afterlife of Acts of God
Workers' compensation, carrier liability, and other places a metaphysical defense goes to keep working.
The doctrinal literature agrees the act-of-God defense is shrinking, or dying, or dead. Two state supreme courts, looked at together, suggest the framing is too undifferentiated. The New York Court of Appeals last adjudicated the defense on the merits in 1918 and has not returned to it. The Illinois Supreme Court kept adjudicating it through 2006, and where the 20th-century IL record clusters it clusters in workers'-compensation appeals applying a "special or greater risk" test to tornado and lightning injuries at work — four of the eight post-1920 IL adjudications, and four of the five post-1930 tort adjudications. Where the two courts did decide, they rejected the defense at nearly identical rates — NY 31%, IL 32%. The divergence is survival, not outcome. Doctrines do not die uniformly; they migrate into whatever adjacent structure statute leaves available, and where statute forecloses the migration, the doctrine simply stops adjudicating.
The divergence is survival
The rejection rates match; the survival rates do not.
The workers' comp afterlife
The phrase moves from carrier to tort, and the post-1930 tort record is four Industrial Commission appeals and one country-club premises case.
The ledger
Most mentions are not decisions. The ratio itself is the finding.
The ground truth
All 72 cases a high court actually decided, plotted on the year of decision.
Methods
Corpus. Caselaw Access Project static bulk (case.law): the full reporter series of the New York Court of Appeals (N.Y., N.Y.2d, N.Y.3d) and the Illinois Supreme Court (Ill., Ill.2d), 1847–2017. West's New York Supplement (N.Y.S.) is in the 273,363-opinion denominator but excluded from every figure — the essay is about two state supreme courts.
Extraction. Regex \bact[s]?\s+of\s+[Gg]od\b over full opinion text, ±3-paragraph window per hit. Related doctrinal phrases (vis major, damnum fatale, inevitable accident) captured in parallel and kept separate. 299 hit-cases on the primary phrase; 416 rows once related terms fold in.
Classification. Gemini 2.5 Pro via Vertex AI batch, temperature 0, one request per case. Four-axis JSON schema: merits_adjudicated (does the court apply the doctrine, or merely mention it?), disposition (succeeded / failed / not_reached / unclear), domain, event_type. 416 rows, zero parse errors. The merits_adjudicated field separates the 72 cases a high court actually decided from the 344 where the phrase appears but the court does nothing with it.
Limitations. Appellate only — trial pleadings and pre-appeal settlements invisible. Two jurisdictions only. Post-2017 requires a CourtListener extension. No hand-coded validation set; labels rest on the ±3-paragraph window, not the full opinion. Pipeline and long-form findings in findings.md; number-level audit in audit.md.